Happy Boy's next video?
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:22 am
well, i shot some more footage friday morning afer working thursday night, and since i had the rest of the day off i really took my time...a couple of times!
i was really turned on thinking about what i was going to do and couldn't wait, so i had a session as soon as i got home in the 90 minutes or so before my wife and kids get up for the day. a few hours later after they were all on their way to their respective destinations and i had the house to myself, i set up the camera, popped in a new tape, popped on my tossle cap, and started enjoying myself. i don't know where the time went to, but it seemed like i was just starting to really get into it when i looked at the monitor and saw the 'low tape' indicator going off...meaning i had been at it for an hour and a half, and that i had less than five minutes to come up with an ending to the video!
well, end it i did...and with a pleasant surprise to boot. i was upset that my last tape had gone so quickly because i was definitely not done yet, but without the need to be in front of the camera, i moved into the bedroom where i could get more comfortable and really enjoy my third session before i finally lay down to get some well earned sleep.
anyhow, before i post the video i shot, i was wondering what folks thought about the quality vs. size compromise i came up with for the last one. did you wish that i had kept the quality higher even though it would mean a bigger download? or do you wish that i had made the files smaller even though it would mean the picture would be fuzzier and more pixelated? or was baby bear's settings *juuust* *riiiight*?
this time i have edited out the last 25 minutes (there was a natural break at that point as the mailman came to deliver a package!) which looks like it will be about 104mb using the same settings as last time, and about 2 minutes of the cum shot (~8.6mb). i could trim it down more, but i thought folks might like seeing me start from totally soft. i could also trim out some of the parts where i am just playing with myself while i catch my breath and stretch my back the other way...
there is also the possibility that someone out there knows of a better codec than divx 5 that would allow me to do both (increase quality *with* smaller files)...i have been learning about all kinds of video stuff, but i am still no expert!
i'm anxious to put this up, but want to do what works best for the most people, so let me know! i'm starting a poll and i'll probably go with what the majority say by friday, but i'll leave it open and take further votes for future videos (if i do more).
i was really turned on thinking about what i was going to do and couldn't wait, so i had a session as soon as i got home in the 90 minutes or so before my wife and kids get up for the day. a few hours later after they were all on their way to their respective destinations and i had the house to myself, i set up the camera, popped in a new tape, popped on my tossle cap, and started enjoying myself. i don't know where the time went to, but it seemed like i was just starting to really get into it when i looked at the monitor and saw the 'low tape' indicator going off...meaning i had been at it for an hour and a half, and that i had less than five minutes to come up with an ending to the video!
well, end it i did...and with a pleasant surprise to boot. i was upset that my last tape had gone so quickly because i was definitely not done yet, but without the need to be in front of the camera, i moved into the bedroom where i could get more comfortable and really enjoy my third session before i finally lay down to get some well earned sleep.
anyhow, before i post the video i shot, i was wondering what folks thought about the quality vs. size compromise i came up with for the last one. did you wish that i had kept the quality higher even though it would mean a bigger download? or do you wish that i had made the files smaller even though it would mean the picture would be fuzzier and more pixelated? or was baby bear's settings *juuust* *riiiight*?
this time i have edited out the last 25 minutes (there was a natural break at that point as the mailman came to deliver a package!) which looks like it will be about 104mb using the same settings as last time, and about 2 minutes of the cum shot (~8.6mb). i could trim it down more, but i thought folks might like seeing me start from totally soft. i could also trim out some of the parts where i am just playing with myself while i catch my breath and stretch my back the other way...
there is also the possibility that someone out there knows of a better codec than divx 5 that would allow me to do both (increase quality *with* smaller files)...i have been learning about all kinds of video stuff, but i am still no expert!
i'm anxious to put this up, but want to do what works best for the most people, so let me know! i'm starting a poll and i'll probably go with what the majority say by friday, but i'll leave it open and take further votes for future videos (if i do more).
)